In my English Literature class we discussed a poem that goes by the name "The Garden of Love." This William Blake written poem discusses the idea of what freedom really constitutes as. In the poem a young boy reminisces about a beautiful field he once played in that is now controlled by a religious group who built a Cathedral and a graveyard and now the boy feels as if he has had something taken away from them. In that class discussion I commented on what freedom means to different people and how some people can help people feel free through other ways they may be overlooking. This is something I already had written but I wanted to share it somewhere it is not confined to the people in my class. It is an issue that always comes to mind.
I'm not trying to be sacrilegious in any way. I respect all religions
and whatever a person may want to believe in. That being said, the only
thing that lives truly free on Earth anymore are plants and wild
animals both to a certain degree. Humans live under other humans that
have obtained more power. Many animals live under the rule of humans but
their several species that live amongst themselves and no other inhabitable humans. Plants do nothing more than grow freely wherever
they are and even if they are in a garden or in a pot inside somewhere
they are still free and live under less confinement than most other
living things in this world. This takes me back to the poem and how
Blake uses plants as a symbol for freedom. The flowers in the garden and
the other plant life grew freely in an open field without being planted
by man or having in sort of influence. Later on in life a cohort of
religious locals decide that they are going to build in that location
thus, ceasing all plant life.The moment they began digging up the field
in preparation for the Chapel is the same moment they stole the plants
freedom. On top of that, they didn't even plant more but rather
"planted" beings that were already dead. This coincides with the
children who had fond memories of running around in a beautiful field
but now no longer have that option. The only option they now have in
that location is to sit at a pew and sing to a God they have never seen
before. This is the part where I fear I cross lines with sacrilege. This
story can be connected with modern times and religion. One defined
thing that cannot be denied is that if people come across controversy in
their life whether it be a natural disaster or something along those
lines is that money can help their cause so they can rebuild. Many
religions are known to pray for the unfortunate people that have come
across such horrors. There is nothing wrong with that in any way and it
is nice to have good thoughts put out for those people but the issue is
with where they pray. Religious people have shown that they are willing
to spend an abundance of money on their buildings that they worship in.
Some of them have technology greater than public schools have. This
money ought to go to a cause greater than that such as helping the less
fortunate. It confuses me that such grand temples are made in the names
of deities that are supposed to be against materialism. Worship in an
all gold Cathedral should not be held higher than worship in a cardboard
box.
No comments:
Post a Comment